| 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
国际体育仲裁院（CAS）在仲裁中持续援引先例却并未承认先例的地位，这一矛盾立场导致援引先例缺乏统一标准及类案裁决结果不一，使后续仲裁与运动员理解规则陷入困境。从理论角度探索CAS先例制度的构建：(1)宏观层面的依据包括全球体育法理论及体育仲裁的准司法性理论。(2)微观层面的构成要件可以分为实质要素与规范要素，前者包含判断标准与判断方法，后者包含裁决要点与裁决理由。此外，还需相应的配套制度作为制约机制保障先例制度在适用中具备灵活性。CAS先例制度的运作并不要求仲裁庭必须援引先例，而是致力于以独特的形式增强案件仲裁过程与结果的公平公正。CAS先例制度的构建能够为中国体育仲裁委员会在制度和实践方面提供参考，并且为中国仲裁当事方在维权能力提升和证据准备方面带来启示。
Abstract：The Court of Arbitration for Sport(CAS) has continuously used precedents in arbitration, but it never recognizes the status of precedents. This contradictory position has led to the lack of unified standards for using precedents and the differences in the results of similar cases, which has made it difficult for subsequent arbitration and athletes to understand the rules. Therefore, this study tries to construct the CAS precedential system from a two-level theoretical perspective. One is the macro level, including the theory of the Lex Sportiva and the quasijudicial nature of sports arbitration. The second is the micro level, that is, the constituent elements of the system,which can be divided into substantive elements and normative elements: the former contains judgment standards and methods, while the latter contains ruling points and reasons. In addition, there are corresponding supporting systems as a restrictive mechanism to ensure the flexibility of the precedential system in the application. The operation of the CAS precedential system does not require the arbitration tribunal to use precedents, but is committed to enhancing the fairness and justice of the arbitration process and results in a unique form. In addition,the construction of the CAS precedent system can provide reference for the China Commission of Arbitration for Sport in terms of system and practice, and provide inspiration for the arbitration parties in China in improving their rights protection ability and preparing evidence.
[1]郭树理，王迪.国际体育仲裁院遵循先例制度的形成与展望：以兴奋剂案件为例[J].北京体育大学学报，2022,45(11):70-83
[2]杨秀清.先例在国际体育仲裁法律适用中的指引作用探析[J].体育科学，2014,34(1):21-27
[3]KAUFMANN-KOHLER G. Arbitral precedent:Dream,necessity or excuse?:The 2006 freshfields lecture[J].Arbitration International,2007,23(3):357-378
[4]CAS. CAS 2017/A/5061 Samir Nasri v. Union des Associations Européennes de Football(UEFA)[EB/OL].[2024-01-11]. https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared%20Docu ments/5061.pdf
[5]CAS. CAS 2018/A/5885 Scott Salmond v. International Ice Hockey Federation(IIHF)&CAS 2018/A/5936 World Anti-Doping Agency(WADA)v. IIHF&Scott Salmond[EB/OL].[2024-01-23]. https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared%20Documents/5885,%205936.pdf
[6]刘树德，孙海波.类案检索实用指南[M].北京：北京大学出版社，2021:32
[7]CAS. CAS 2017/A/5301, Sara Errani v. International Tennis Federation(ITF)&CAS 2017/A/5302 National Anti-Doping Organisation(Nado)Italia v. Sara Errani and ITF[EB/OL].[2024-02-09]. http://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared%20Documents/5301,%205302.pdf
[8]CAS. CAS 2018/A/5546 JoséPaolo Guerrero v. Fédération Internationale de Football Association(FIFA)&CAS2018/A/5571 World Anti-Doping Agency(WADA)v.FIFA&JoséPaolo Guerrero[EB/OL].[2024-02-16]. https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared%20Documents/5546,%205571.pdf
[9]CAS. CAS 2015/A/4215 Fédération Internationale de Football Association(FIFA)v. Korea Football Association(KFA)&Kang Soo Il[EB/OL].[2024-02-04]. https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared%20Documents/4215.pdf
[10]CAS. CAS 2019/A/6249 Roman Balandin v. Association Russian Anti-Doping Agency(RUSADA)[EB/OL].[2024-02-26]. https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared%20Documents/6249.pdf
[11]CAS. CAS 2019/A/6313, Jarrion Lawson v. International Association of Athletics Federations[EB/OL].[2024-02-26]. https://www.doping.nl/media/kb/6463/CAS%202019_A_6313%20Jarrion%20Lawson%20vs%20IAAF%20%28O S%29.pdf
[12]CAS. CAS 2016/A/4563 World Anti-Doping Agency(WADA)v. Egyptian Anti-Doping Organisation(EGYNADO)&Radwa Arafa Abd Elsalam[EB/OL].[2024-02-27]. https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared%20Documen ts/4563.pdf
[13]CAS. CAS 2016/A/4834 World Anti-Doping Agency(WADA)v. Organización Nacional Antidopaje del Ecuador(ONADE)&Monica Maria Cajamarca Illescas[EB/OL].[2024-03-02]. https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared%20Documents/4834.pdf
[14]CAS. CAS 2017/A/5315 World Anti-Doping Agency(WADA)v. Federación Colombiana de Fútbol(FCF)and Yobani Jose Ricardo Garcia&CAS 2017/A/5316 World Anti-Doping Agency(WADA)v. Federación Colombiana de Fútbol(FCF)and Daniel Londono Castaneda[EB/OL].[2024-03-03]. https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared%20Documents/5315,%205316.pdf
[15]GOTLIB Z. Athletes have rights, too, right:Investigating the extreme unfairness in sports'purported supreme authority-Why the International Court of Arbitration for Sport fails to reign supreme[J]. Cardozo Journal of International&Comparative Law,2015,24:389
[16]GUILLAUME G. The use of precedent by international judges and arbitrators[J]. Journal of International Dispute Settlement,2011,2(1):5-23
[17]IOANNIDIS G. The influence of common law traditions on the practice and procedure before the Court of Arbitration for Sport(CAS)[M]//Yearbook of international sports arbitration 2015. The Hague:T. M. C. Asser Press,2016:17-38
[18]BLACKSHAW I. The Court of Arbitration for Sport:An international forum for settling disputes effectively'within the family of sport'[J]. Entertainment and Sports Law Journal,2003,2(2):61
[19]杨磊.论国际体育仲裁院实体法律适用机制的特殊性[J].天津体育学院学报，2014,29(4):330-335
[20]BERSAGEL A. Is there a stare decisis doctrine in the Court of Arbitration for Sport:An analysis of published awards for anti-doping disputes in track and field[J]. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal,2012,12:189
[21]波特.普通法简史[M].武卓韵，译.北京：北京大学出版社，2022:3
[22]龚国伟，李楠.两大法系“判例制度”之比较：兼谈我国判例制度的构建[J].广东经济管理学院学报，2004(5):78-82
[23]PONZETTO G A M,FERNANDEZ P A. Case law versus statute law:An evolutionary comparison[J]. The Journal of Legal Studies,2008,37(2):379-430
[24]POLVINO B A T. Arbitration as preventative medicine for Olympic Ailments:The International Olympic Committee's Court of Arbitration for Sport and the future for the settlement of international sporting disputes[J]. Emory International Law Review,1994,8:347
[25]LENARD M. The future of sports dispute resolution[J].Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal,2009,10(1):173
[26]FOSTER K. Lex sportiva and lex ludica:The Court of Arbitration for Sport's jurisprudence[M]//Lex sportiva:What is sports law?. The Hague:T. M. C. Asser Press,2012:123-148
[27]NAFZIGER J A R. International sports law[M]. New York:Transnational Publications,2004:50
[28]吴义华.全球法视野下的体育法：“全球体育法”的生成[J].天津体育学院学报，2016,31(5):436-441
[29]向会英.国际体育仲裁院与“Lex Sportiva”的发展研究[J].体育与科学，2012,33(6):40-44
[30]沈奕灵.国际投资仲裁中事实上遵循先例的研究[D].上海：华东政法大学，2020:46
[31]郑璐，张冲.我国体育仲裁司法监督模式选择[J].价值工程，2012,31(18):290-291
[32]张文闻，吴义华.国际体育仲裁院仲裁权的法理分析[J].体育研究与教育，2017,32(6):25-29
[33]张春良.强制性体育仲裁协议的合法性论证：CAS仲裁条款的效力考察兼及对中国的启示[J].体育与科学，2011,32(2):23-27
[34]屈茂辉.类推适用的私法价值与司法运用[J].法学研究，2005,27(1):3-19
[35]王利明.成文法传统中的创新：怎么看待案例指导制度[EB/OL].[2024-08-17]. https://www.chinacourt.org/arti cle/detail/2012/02/id/473206.shtml
[36]STONE J. The ratio of the ratio decindendi[J]. The Modern Law Review,1959,22:597
[37]杨知文.类案适用的司法论证[J].法学研究，2022,44(5):54-68
[38]CAS. CAS 2012/A/2972 Matti Helminen v. Royale Ligue Vélocipédique Belge(RLVB)[EB/OL].[2024-03-06].https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared%20Documents/2972.pdf
[39]CAS. CAS 2016/A/4643 Maria Sharapova v. International Tennis Federation(ITF)[EB/OL].[2024-03-11]. https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/SharedDocuments/4643.pdf
[40]CAS. CAS 2008/A/1545 Andrea Anderson, La Tasha Colander Clark,Jearl Miles-Clark,Torri Edwards,Chryste Gaines, Monique Hennagan, Passion Richardson v. International Olympic Committee(IOC)[EB/OL].[2024-03-17]. http://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared%20Documents/1545.pdf
[41]SCHREUER C H. Preliminary rulings in investment arbitration[C]//SAUVANT K. Appeals mechanism in international investment disputes. Oxford:Oxford University Press,2008:207-212
[42]LENZ C O. The role and mechanism of the preliminary ruling procedure[J]. Fordham International Law Journal,1994,18:388
[43]周青山.国际体育仲裁院权威的体育纠纷解决机构[N].人民法院报，2017-08-25(8)
[44]中国体育仲裁委员会已受理体育仲裁申请24起[EB/OL].[2024-05-24]. http://sports.news.cn/20240131/750c2e9f5408451dbbfb164718cf43e1/c.html
[45]王迪.国际体育仲裁院援引先例的中国启示[J].体育科研，2023,44(5):36-46
基本信息:
DOI：10.16099/j.sus.2024.12.27.0006
中图分类号:G811
引用信息:
[1]马忠法,王迪.国际体育仲裁院先例制度的构建与中国镜鉴[J].上海体育大学学报,2025,49(09):1-16.DOI:10.16099/j.sus.2024.12.27.0006.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金重大项目（18ZDA153）