| 1,569 | 28 | 79 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
作为主流体育赛事裁判模式的机器辅助裁判模式,受限于对体育赛事流畅性的追求,在实现体育赛事裁判的价值方面产生以下困境:在事实层面动摇公正性价值;在机器运算过程中破坏公开性价值;在运动员权利保障方面损害公平性价值。基于人工智能的技术能力,在人机协同裁判模式下,体育赛事流畅性与裁判价值的矛盾可以得到化解。为建立人机协同裁判模式,建议:承认人工智能具有裁判资格,使其享有独立作出判罚的权力;改进算法决策的内在缺陷,抵御算法决策的外在干扰;通过区分事实性判罚与非事实性判罚,在事实性判罚中改变机器设备的辅助定位,构建类似于“两审终审暨审判监督制度”的人机协同裁判模式。
Abstract:As the mainstream referee mode for sports events, the machine assisted referee mode, limited by the pursuit of smoothness in sports events, has caused the following problems in realizing the value of sports event referees: it has shaken the impartiality at the factual level; it has damaged the openness in the machine calculation;it has damaged the fairness in athlete rights. Based on the technological capabilities of artificial intelligence, the contradiction between smoothness and the value of sports referee can be resolved with the human-machine collaborative referee mode. To establish a human-machine collaborative referee mode, it is proposed that artificial intelligence should be recognized as having the qualification to make judgments and the power to make independent judgments. The inherent defects of algorithmic decision-making should be improved to resist external interference from algorithmic decision-making. It is necessary to distinguish between factual and non factual judgments, change the auxiliary positioning of machine equipment in factual judgments, and construct a humanmachine collaborative judgment mode similar to the "two instance final trial and trial supervision system".
[1]都梵.有了人工智能帮忙这届世界杯的越位判罚将更快、更准[N].科技日报,2022-07-20(6)
[2]“机器人裁判”在大西洋联盟全明星赛上首次亮相[EB/OL].[2024-01-26]. https://www.163.com/dy/article/EJR4RLC5053778A2.html
[3]魏依晨. AI“征战”东京奥运会人工智能+体育赛事未来可期[N].科技日报,2021-08-02(6)
[4]走近冬奥|AI辅助评分中国花样滑冰AI辅助评分系统1.0发布[EB/OL].[2023-06-08]. https://m.gmw.cn/baijia/2022-01/23/1302774947.html
[5]李志中,林波萍,张智.鹰眼系统对足球运动发展的影响[J].广州体育学院学报,2011,31(1):82-84
[6]徐伟康.体育裁判人工智能化的正当性困境与应对[J].体育科学,2022,42(11):90-97
[7]邬红丽,唐小飞.不同裁判模式对第三方公众赛事公平性感知的影响研究:基于理解错觉的中介和道德理解的调节[J].体育科学,2022,42(9):90-97
[8]HAMILTON M. The moral ambiguity of the makeup call[J]. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 2011, 38(2):212-228
[9]COLLINS H, EVANS R. You cannot be serious! Public understanding of technology with special reference to"Hawk-Eye"[J]. Public Understanding of Science, 2008,17(3):283-308
[10]COLLINS H,EVANS R. Sport-decision aids and the"CSIeffect":Why cricket uses Hawk-Eye well and tennis uses it badly[J]. Public Understanding of Science, 2012, 21(8):904-921
[11]仇筠茜,陈昌凤.基于人工智能与算法新闻透明度的“黑箱”打开方式选择[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,51(5):84-88,159
[12]王立小,张晓健,钱来.“鹰眼”技术在国际重大性排球赛事中的运用研究[J].体育世界(学术版),2020(1):15-16
[13]张一迪.花样滑冰比赛背后的“AI裁判”[N].中国电子报,2022-02-15(6)
[14]半自动越位识别技术屡发神威它到底好不好[EB/OL].[2023-03-17]. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1750929215892254184&wfr=spider&for=pc
[15]李伟峰.足球裁判行使判罚“自由裁量权”的影响因素探析[J].天津体育学院学报,2009,24(3):257-260
[16]徐彳汀,周雁.电子线审取代人工司线裁判员对网球大满贯赛事的影响[J].体育科技文献通报,2022,30(12):84-86
[17]张鹏,周德铨.即时回放挑战规则的比较反思与制度优化[J].武汉体育学院学报,2020,54(7):94-100
[18]王洪彪.越位判罚决策中的误判:主观故意还是非人力所能及[J].沈阳体育学院学报,2014,33(1):122-129
[19]张琪,于涛.裁判自由裁量权的伦理规治[J].体育科学,2015,35(5):78-87
[20]张宇晖.算法决策的结构化问责机制:欧盟经验与中国借鉴[J].上海政法学院学报(法治论丛),2022,37(4):125-143
[21]张贵红,邓克涛.社会化研究框架下算法公平性的实现策略研究[J/OL].[2023-03-17].科学学研究. https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20230206.001
[22]柳亦博,高洁,李轶倩.人工智能参与决策对行政伦理的影响及其治理之道[J].中共天津市委党校学报,2022,24(6):55-63
[23]颜佳华.提升政府治理算法决策公平性的机制与路径[J].行政论坛,2022,29(3):34-40
[24]侯东德,张可法.算法自动化决策的属性、场域与风险规制[J].学术研究,2022(8):36-44,177
[25]郭春镇,黄思晗.刑事司法人工智能信任及其构建[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2023,63(2):19-34,234
[26]卡塔尔世界杯最假的不是裁判,是半自动越位科技SAOT[EB/OL].[2024-01-26]. https://www.163.com/dy/article/HNB4T3830553G6LK.html
[27]孙树光.论法定犯裁判事实证成中人机协同系统的建构[J].当代法学,2020,34(2):56-66
[28]VERSTEEG R, MARUNCIC K. Instant replay:A contemporary legal analysis[J]. Mississippi Sports Law Review,2015,4(2):153-273
[29]杜宁,李毅钧.我国排球联赛鹰眼裁判辅助系统研究[J].体育文化导刊,2017(10):91-95
基本信息:
DOI:10.16099/j.sus.2023.03.22.0001
中图分类号:TP18;G808.2
引用信息:
[1]姚万勤,李灿.人机协同:体育赛事裁判模式的转型与建构[J].上海体育大学学报,2024,48(02):70-79.DOI:10.16099/j.sus.2023.03.22.0001.
基金信息:
重庆市新型犯罪研究中心研究项目(23XXFZX10)
2024-02-15
2024-02-15