| 26 | 0 | 633 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 探究跑鞋碳板（carbon-fiber plate，CFP）结构设计对前足足底和足底筋膜力学响应的影响，为预防跑步时的足部损伤和跑鞋结构优化提供参考。方法 基于已搭建的足-鞋三维有限元模型，对比不同位置（鞋垫底部，HL；中底中部，ML；外底上部，LL）以及不同厚度（1 mm、2 mm、3 mm）的CFP结构设计对前掌跑（FFS）落地冲击阶段前足足底压力和足底筋膜应力、应变的影响。结果 当CFP厚度较小（1 mm）时，其嵌入位置对前足足底和足底筋膜力学响应特征的影响有所不同。与对照跑鞋（No CFP，NC）相比，HL和ML情况下足底压力峰值分别增加了3.84%和4.31%，而LL情况下近端足底筋膜的应力与应变峰值分别增加了2.67%和3.19%。随着CFP厚度增加至3 mm，足底压力、足底筋膜应力与应变均明显减小，其中：足底压力峰值以LL3（3 mm，LL）情况下降低最为明显，较NC降低了29.56%；足底筋膜应力与应变峰值也均明显低于NC，且3种位置CFP的效果基本一致。结论 当CFP厚度较小时，其嵌入位置的不同或将对足部组织力学产生相异的作用，但随着CFP厚度增加，足底压力、足底筋膜受力程度均明显减小，且嵌入LL的CFP整体效果更好。
Abstract：Objective To explore the effect of different parametrical designs with carbon-fiber plate (CFP) structure in running shoes on the mechanical response of the forefoot and plantar fascia, so as to provide references for the prevention of running-related foot injuries and optimization of running shoes. Methods Based on the established 3D foot-shoe finite element model, changes of forefoot plantar pressure and stress and strain in plantar fascia were analyzed at the impact peak of forefoot strike (FFS) running when wearing shoes with different CFP designs, including three different locations (high-loaded, HL, just below the insole; mid-loaded, ML, in between the midsole; and low-loaded, LL, just above the outsole) and three thicknesses (1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm). Results When the CFP thickness was small (1 mm), the effects of its embedded locations on the mechanical response of the forefoot and plantar fascia was different. Compared with the no-CFP shoe (NC), the peak plantar pressure in HL and ML situations increased by 3.84% and 4.31%, respectively, while the peak stress and strain values of the proximal plantar fascia in the LL situation increased by 2.67% and 3.19%, respectively. With the increase of CFP thickness (3 mm), the plantar pressure, plantar fascia stress, and strain all decreased greatly, with the peak plantar pressure decreasing the most in the LL3 (3 mm, LL) situation, which was 29.56% lower than NC. The peak plantar fascia stress and strain were also greatly lower than NC, and the effects of CFP at the three locations were basically the same. Conclusions When the CFP thickness is small, different embedded locations may have varying effects on foot mechanics. However, as the CFP thickness increases, plantar pressure and plantar fascia loading gradually decrease, and low-loaded CFP achieves better results.
[1] CHEN H R,SHAO E Z,SUN D,et al. Effects of footwear with different longitudinal bending stiffness on biomechanical characteristics and muscular mechanics of lower limbs in adolescent runners[J]. Front Physiol,2022,13:1499
[2] LIU Q,CHEN H R,SONG Y,et al. Running velocity and longitudinal bending stiffness influence the asymmetry of kinematic variables of the lower limb joints[J]. Bioengineering,2022,9(11):607
[3] 孙冬,宋杨,全文静,等. 跑鞋抗弯刚度调整对下肢生物力学表现及跑步经济性的影响研究[J]. 中国体育科技,2022,58(7):68-75
[4] 叶靖怡,陈海荣,宋杨,等. 跑鞋纵向抗弯刚度调整对青少年下肢生物力学影响的研究[J]. 应用力学学报,2022,39(2):209-217
[5] ORTEGA J A,HEALEY L A,SWINNEN W,et al. Energetics and biomechanics of running footwear with increased longitudinal bending stiffness:A narrative review[J]. Sports Medicine,2021,51(5):873-894
[6] OH K,PARK S. The bending stiffness of shoes is beneficial to running energetics if it does not disturb the natural MTP joint flexion[J]. Journal of Biomechanics,2017,53:127-135
[7] STEFANYSHYN D J,NIGG B M. Influence of midsole bending stiffness on joint energy and jump height performance[J]. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,2000,32(2):471-476
[8] MADDEN R,SAKAGUCHI M,TOMARAS E K,et al. Forefoot bending stiffness,running economy and kinematics during overground running[J]. Footwear Science,2016,8(2):91-98
[9] FLORES N,RAO G,BERTON E,et al. The stiff plate location into the shoe influences the running biomechanics[J]. Sports Biomechanics,2021,20(7):815-830
[10] BECK O N,GOLYSKI P R,SAWICKI G S. Adding carbon fiber to shoe soles may not improve running economy:A muscle-level explanation[J]. Scientific Reports,2020,10(1):1-13
[11] MCLEOD A R,BRUENING D,JOHNSON A W,et al. Improving running economy through altered shoe bending stiffness across speeds[J]. Footwear Science,2020,12(2):79-89
[12] HOOGKAMER W,KIPP S,FRANK J H,et al. A comparison of the energetic cost of running in marathon racing shoes[J]. Sports Medicine,2018,48(4):1009-1019
[13] FLORES N,DELATTRE N,BERTON E,et al. Does an increase in energy return and/or longitudinal bending stiffness shoe features reduce the energetic cost of running?[J]. European Journal of Applied Physiology,2019,119(2):429-439
[14] DAY E,HAHN M. Optimal footwear longitudinal bending stiffness to improve running economy is speed dependent[J]. Footwear Science,2020,12(1):3-13
[15] LIN S S,SONG Y,CEN X Z,et al. The implications of sports biomechanics studies on the research and development of running shoes:A systematic review[J]. Bioengineering,2022,9(10):497
[16] 顾耀东,孙冬,梅齐昌. 大数据和人工智能背景下运动鞋生物力学研发思路及启示[J]. 上海体育学院学报,2021,45(2):64
[17] 李建设,顾耀东,陆毅琛,等. 运动鞋核心技术的生物力学研究[J]. 体育科学,2009,29(5):40-49
[18] 顾耀东,孙冬,FEKETE G,等. “裸足”运动方式对下肢生物力学功能调整的研究进展[J]. 中国体育科技,2019,55(1):61-74
[19] 顾耀东. 运动生物力学在足部的研究与应用[M]. 北京：科学出版社，2020
[20] KIM H K,ALI MIRJALILI S,FERNANDEZ J. Gait kinetics,kinematics,spatiotemporal and foot plantar pressure alteration in response to long-distance running:Systematic review[J]. Human Movement Science,2018,57:342-356
[21] LI J L,SONG Y,XUAN R R,et al. Effect of long-distance running on inter-segment foot kinematics and ground reaction forces:A preliminary study[J]. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology,2022,10:833774
[22] MEI Q C,GU Y D,XIANG L L,et al. Foot pronation contributes to altered lower extremity loading after long distance running[J]. Frontiers in Physiology,2019,10:573
[23] 梅齐昌,相亮亮,孙冬,等. 长距离跑后“足外翻”姿态增加膝关节内侧接触力:基于OpenSim肌骨建模及机器学习预测的研究[J]. 体育科学,2019,39(9):51-59
[24] 相亮亮,梅齐昌,李建设,等. 不同缓冲(能力)跑鞋对跑者膝、踝关节局部动态稳定性的影响[J]. 中国体育科技,2023,59(4):84-93
[25] 刘姣姣. 足-鞋有限元模型的建立及在足底筋膜研究中的应用[D]. 北京：北京体育大学，2019
[26] RIBEIRO A P,TROMBINI-SOUZA F,TESSUTTI V D,et al. The effects of plantar fasciitis and pain on plantar pressure distribution of recreational runners[J]. Clinical Biomechanics,2011,26(2):194-199
[27] CHEN T L W,WONG D W C,WANG Y,et al. Foot arch deformation and plantar fascia loading during running with rearfoot strike and forefoot strike:A dynamic finite element analysis[J]. Journal of Biomechanics,2019,83:260-272
[28] SONG Y,CEN X Z,ZHANG Y,et al. Development and validation of a subject-specific coupled model for foot and sports shoe complex:A pilot computational study[J]. Bioengineering,2022,9(10):553
[29] SONG Y,CEN X Z,CHEN H R,et al. The influence of running shoe with different carbon-fiber plate designs on internal foot mechanics:A pilot computational analysis[J]. Journal of Biomechanics,2023,153:111597
[30] CEN X Z,SONG Y,SUN D,et al. Applications of finite element modeling in biomechanical analysis of foot arch deformation:A scoping review[J]. Journal of Biomecha- nical Engineering,2023,145(7):070801
[31] SONG Y,SHAO E Z,BÍRÓ I,et al. Finite element modelling for footwear design and evaluation:A systematic scoping review[J]. Heliyon,2022,8(10):e10940
[32] BOYER E R,ROONEY B D,DERRICK T R. Rearfoot and midfoot or forefoot impacts in habitually shod runners[J]. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise,2014,46(7):1384-1391
[33] 张希妮,邓力勤,肖松林,等. 不同鞋条件对后跟着地跑者跟腱负荷特征的影响[J]. 医用生物力学,2021,36(5):797-804
[34] 魏震,王琳. 基于统计参数映射分析不同习惯落地模式跑者跑步过程中地面反力的差异[J]. 应用力学学报,2023,40(2):474-480
[35] ZWAFERINK J B J,CUSTERS W,PAARDEKOOPER I,et al. Effect of a carbon reinforcement for maximizing shoe outsole bending stiffness on plantar pressure and walking comfort in people with diabetes at high risk of foot ulceration[J]. Gait & Posture,2021,86:341-345
[36] CHEN W M,LEE S J,LEE P V S. Plantar pressure relief under the metatarsal heads–Therapeutic insole design using three-dimensional finite element model of the foot[J]. Journal of Biomechanics,2015,48(4):659-665
[37] CHEN Y N,CHANG C W,LI C T,et al. Finite element analysis of plantar fascia during walking:A quasi-static simulation[J]. Foot & Ankle International,2015,36(1):90-97
[38] ELLISON M A,FULFORD J,JAVADI A,et al. Do non-rearfoot runners experience greater second metatarsal stresses than rearfoot runners?[J]. Journal of Biomechanics,2021,126:110647
[39] MATIJEVICH E S,BRANSCOMBE L M,SCOTT L R,et al. Ground reaction force metrics are not strongly correlated with tibial bone load when running across speeds and slopes:Implications for science,sport and wearable tech[J]. PLoS One,2019,14(1):e0210000
[40] RODRIGO-CARRANZA V,GONZÁLEZ-MOHÍNO F,SANTOS-CONCEJERO J,et al. The effects of footwear midsole longitudinal bending stiffness on running economy and ground contact biomechanics:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. European Journal of Sport Science,2022,22(10):1508-1521
基本信息:
DOI：10.16099/j.sus.2023.09.27.0002
引用信息:
[1]宋杨1,2,岑炫震1,2,孙冬1,等.跑鞋碳板结构设计对前掌跑落地冲击阶段足部力学响应特征的影响[J],2024,48(10):29-37.DOI:10.16099/j.sus.2023.09.27.0002.
基金信息:
浙江省重点研发计划资助项目（2021C03130）；浙江省自然科学基金杰出青年项目（LR22A020002）