板块周期“叫板”马氏运动训练分期理论——基于科学史的释疑与讨论Does Block Periodization Challenge Traditional Periodization Training Theory?—Discussion Based on History of Science
胡海旭,佟岗,刘文武,沈政,杜长亮
HU Haixu, TONG Gang, LIU Wenwu, SHEN Zheng, DU Changliang
摘要(Abstract):
通过对运动训练分期及其相关理论的科学史梳理,认为:运动训练分期理论起源于人们对日常生活规律的启迪,马特维耶夫在此基础上汲取苏联组织形态学的一般系统理论建立传统运动训练分期理论,但因偏重方法论导致在实践中"解谜"效率不高,进而招致诸如板块周期的提出与批驳,并出现训练分期理论的早、中、晚期之争。提出:现代运动训练分期理论更应吸收一般系统论的最新研究成果,借助多学科理论与方法向具体、特质性系统的运动训练分期理论发展。
The study summed up the scientific history of periodization and its related theories. It holds that the traditional periodization theory originates from the inspiration of the laws of people's daily life. Matveyev thus founded the traditional periodization training theory after absorbing the general system theory in the work of Histomorphology in the former Soviet Union. However, there appeared the criticism from block periodization and debate over the early, mid and late periods on this theory owing to its stress on methodology. The study proposes that the modern periodization training theory should absorb the latest research results from the general system and develop the theory to a more detailed and systematic direction with characteristics, with the aid of multi-disciplinary and methods.
关键词(KeyWords):
运动训练分期理论;板块周期;组织形态学;一般系统论
periodization training theory;block periodization;histomorphology;general system theory
基金项目(Foundation): 江苏省博士后基金资助项目(1402039C);南京航空航天大学自主科研课题(1016-YH14042)
作者(Author):
胡海旭,佟岗,刘文武,沈政,杜长亮
HU Haixu, TONG Gang, LIU Wenwu, SHEN Zheng, DU Changliang